VADS user needs survey 1998: Report
A report of the results of the VADS User Needs Survey
carried out between December 1997 and February 1998
Last updated: 16 June 1998Authors: Catherine Grout and Janine Rymer
 | A: Survey Methodology |  |
 | B: Survey Results |  |
 | C: Comparison with Relevant Surveys |  |
 | D: VADS Survey Questionnaire |  |
Primarily the survey was intended to supply VADS with the maximum amount of relevant information from its user and depositor communities while not exceeding available resources.
It was intended to facilitate the setting up and development of the service in three crucial respects:
The survey population were defined in three fundamental ways:
The total number of survey respondents was 107.
On the on-line form, the survey was divided into two discrete html pages:
 | the first asked about the background of the respondent and the nature of their engagement with electronic resources (see sections 1, 2, 3 of the Survey Results) |
 | the second asked for specific information about digital resources created within their organisation (Survey Results, sections 4, 5). |
The paper form did not have a physical division between sections (sections were numbered 1 to 5 as below). However, the number of respondents who provided information about resources in sections 4 and 5 was still relatively small.

The electronic version of our survey was launched on 1st December 1997. It was available until 1st February 1997. Responses to this questionnaire were solicited by sending announcements to the following mailbase lists:
vads-ag@mailbase.ac.uk, vads@mailbase.ac.uk, ahds@mailbase.ac.uk, ahds-all@mailbase.ac.uk, chart@mailbase.ac.uk, cti-art-design@mailbase.ac.uk, scran@mailbase.ac.uk, adam-news@mailbase.ac.uk, adam-project@mailbase.ac.uk, lis-elib@mailbase.ac.uk mcg@mailbase.ac.uk
In addition individuals kindly forwarded it to: EDINA User Group ninch-announce@cni.org
Paper Version
17 were completed and returned. It cannot be assumed that all paper surveys requested by individuals to circulate were actually distributed, however the response rate in this section was as the same time quite disappointing, at only 7.4% .
Telephone Interview
 | 36 people were telephoned, interviewed and made aware of the survey. |
 | 13 people who were telephoned completed the survey and returned it. |
 | 6 of those telephoned completed a paper survey and returned it. |
 | 7 of those telephoned and were pointed to the web site completed the online version and sent it. |
The response rate of 36.1% for telephone interview was considerably higher than through the distribution of paper copies.
However set against this must be the time intensiveness of this method of soliciting responses.
 | B: Survey Results |  |
 | C: Comparison with Relevant Surveys |  |
 | D: VADS Survey Questionnaire |  |